Before you read
Subject: The US telecoms giant, already the country’s third largest cable provider, is paying $85.4bn (70bn pound) for the company, which owns CNN and HBO
Excerpt: English text from the archived bilingual edition · Chinese edition
Reference text and retained source material
The US telecoms giant, already the country’s third largest cable provider, is paying $85.4bn (70bn pound) for the company, which owns CNN and HBO
A Senate subcommittee responsible for competition will hold a hearing in November
However AT&T’s chief executive Randall Stephenson believes regulators will approve the deal
Senator Mike Lee, the Republican who chairs the antitrust subcommittee, said the deal would "potentially raise significant antitrust issues, which the subcommittee would carefully examine"
The biggest merger to be announced this year would combine AT&T’s distribution network, which includes 130m mobile phone customers and 25m pay-TV subscribers, with content from the Warner Brothers film studios and the cable TV channels HBO, the Cartoon Network and CNN
The competition concerns centre on higher prices for customers and less consumer choice
A spokesman for the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said there were "a number of questions and concerns" about the deal that regulators needed to scrutinise, but added "there’s still a lot of information that needs to come out before any conclusions should be reached"
Meanwhile Republican candidate Donald Trump has said that he would block the merger if he wins, because it was "too much concentration of power in the hands of too few"
The president does not have the final say - that lies with the US Justice Department, which can approve, block or put conditions on the takeover going through
Other critics, such as John Bergmayer from Public Knowledge, warned that consumers may lose out from the deal. Mr Bergmayer suggested that AT&T might let mobile customers watch TV and films from Time Warner without counting it against their data caps, which would make video from other providers less attractive
But AT&T’s Mr Stephenson argued that there was "no competitive harm that is being rendered by putting these two companies together, so any concerns by the regulators, we believe, will be adequately addressed by conditions."
One expert told Reuters he thought the deal would be approved. Darren Bush, who teaches antitrust at the University of Houston, said the Justice Department would "look at it but they won’t stop it"

Language and reading: using this material
Compare wording, tone and information order across complete passages. Positions, prices, policies, exams and statistics retain their original context and should be verified before practical use.

